About ifxyz.xyz?

This file, for now, will provide some linked background that seems, to me, appropriate. "Me" is the failed potential bit here.
With all the time constraints and information streams we get, I doubt a person might find much time to provide the attention for this stuff some seemingly sentient creature calls "ifxyz.xyz".
I think, perhaps some kind of intro videos and audio will be more appropriate than texts. However, texts, at the time being, is what there is..
Please Do contact to poke, point at typos, missing bits, make fun of, crit, add stuff or ask a question or two.
Can not pretend to know your mind, yet. Nor convincingly try to entertain here.

Currently, this file includes:
Questions from: "What? Why? How? When? Where?"
Questions from: "what's all that regarding sensations and wonders?"
Questions from: "how to try introducing a notation?"
Questions from: "is this kind of ready?"

Questions from: "What? Why? How? When? Where?"

Initial responses to:

What?
ifxyz.xyz attempts to offer ways to share and crucially - evolve - passing and more repetitive wondering.
Wonderings? Like the ones people procrastinate about, ones we go "oh! if I had the time", or just fleetingly passing ones like: "humm.. if clouds were hot chillies?" - and then you move on..
How?
Well. With ifxyz.xyz these kind of wonders and wondering are turned into abstract qualities which..
"abstract qualities"?
Qualities which.. No.. Numbers are abstract quantities, right? 2, for example, is The abstract quantity of all couplings - be it apples, rings, or universes. In ifxyz.xyz, we can turn every wondering sensation into an abstract of its qualities. For example, the sensation of questioning ifxyz.xyz might have a different quality from the wondering sensation of questioning the number 2. The two sensations have different qualities - they operate different. The imagine their interaction different from one another
So.. How do we do that?
With ifxyz.xyz we can focus on characteristic qualities of each wondering sensation. Once we get that quality, it can operate as an abstract. It can operate as its own "thing". Like the quality of ifxyz.xyz, the xyz.xyzNess might be independent from the fact ifxyz.xyz is to do with wondering. It might have a quality of some kind of a framework. Might have other qualities as well.
Why should I give a shit?
Probably for no reason?
I shouldn't?
Why do stuff if its not fun in its itchy sense?
Meaning?
Look, if it's not for you - no worries and why bother. However, it might be kind of desirable for some - me included - to get these wonderings characters and share.
How do you share?
Apart from the tech bit. The fun bits are, for me, being able to check how various sensations might operate, might be imagined. How these wonderings can be combined into new ones and link up with similar yet different, and so on..
Combine?
Yes.. take something like ifxyz.xyzNess with 2Ness. It can be something like: 2Ness_ifxyz.xyzNess, or ifxyz.xyz2Ness, or then stuff as ifxyz.2xyzNess, and so on. Get the idea? Each has its own and rather fresh sensation.
Like the sensation of ifxyz.xyz2Ness as a thing in itself is different from ifxyz.xyzNess and 2Ness on their own?
Yup
Where do I want to do all that?
On a paper? A white board? A bit of sand on the beach? A web server? On ifxyz.xyz?
When is it possible?
Any time you wonder, no?
You clearly don't have a "proper" job! lol
ha! Didn't you just wondered the whereness of ixyz.xyz? An ifxyz.xyzWherNess? The sense of placeness with ifxcyz.xyz.. Did you not just wondered something along these lines?



Questions from: "what's all that regarding sensations and wonders?"

Ever had sensations that do not feel as a sound, not an image, or a scent, nor a taste?
Know sensations that have no words, term-less, feel as stuff - however can not be touched?
Ever sensed such stuff, yet didn't place it in a woolly - e.g. esoteric, mystic, religious (even), mysterious - kind of a category?
Ever sensed such sensations that require no interpretation or explanation just to Be, yet are utterly incomprehensible?

For my sins, I get these sensations seemingly constantly. It seems like ifxyz.xyz is a way at attempting to share?

Questions from: "how to try introducing a notation?"

On a more instrumental note:
ifxyz.xyz offers browsing through files. Files might have a unique extension and ways of notation. That, I hope, comes to focus on the language of ifxyz.xyz, its fluidity and openness. e.g., the language is evolving from - not towards - certain approximations, and its an open process for people and other entities to contribute, take for their own and engage - or not as it comes.

ifxyz.xyz, offers a few takes on and of itself. There are various options, various suggested ideas that might contradict each other - yet come from similar notions. e.g. How to do an If, and others.
While am concerned that this might result in some un-helpful confusion, am currently perplexed as to How else to do this. How else to be honest and share the fact that there are ideas which might be employed? My personal hope or frictiveness is that we are dealing here with some evolutionary processes. However, this might be a double error - neither evolutionary processes, nor a helpful lack of clarity..
Any ideas?? -> very welcome!!
The other element in various kinds for similar stuff is that ifxyz.xyz does indeed intrinsically allow for various sensations of Ifness from a similar kind - to operate and perhaps cooperate and link up, but not by compulsion.


Otherwise, contact with comments, question, etc.?

Questions from: "Is this ready?"

About a year ago, I thought something kinda similar to current ifxyz.xyz wasn't ready. Check these files if interested. It seems that now the stuff is slightly more ready as am beginning to "get" the basics of ifxyz.xyz way and language. It feels like am getting this since I began to add stuff outside of the core operations, and am recalling the initial operations. It used to be that they felt like requiring re-invention every time. Think they were too convoluted..
When "core is "if" - isn't it alterable at all times?
Indeed it is!! Perhaps core is wrong term? Anyhow, what I mean is recalling my own ways of doing the basic stuff. If you can not Feel and sense your own way, there's always the question whether some sense of genuine is missing, no? ;) Perhaps "ready" has to do with feeling genuine?
Are you telling me that doing stuff like: "if (x) ^ ?" or worst: "if (->^|(<-)) ^ ?" - feels genuine for you??!!
Yup. Moreover, the stuff that can be made with it, the wonderings, the sensations, the combinations for new sensations - this feels like lots of fun for me. A bit strange..? I know..